Some writers believe this right of refusal is a logical corollary to the right of informed consent:
Where there is capacity and a right to consent to treatment, one must presume that there is a corresponding capacity and right to refuse … it is likely that any court would rule that a minor has the right to refuse any treatment to which he has a right to consent.
With respect to minors who are incapable of giving informed consent, such consent must be obtained from the parent(s). Sharpe explains:
… it appears to be settled law that parents and guardians have the power to consent to medical treatment on behalf of a minor incapable of understanding the nature and consequences of the treatment. Parents and guardians are, of course, presumed to be acting in the best interests of the minor. Where a physician is of the view that the parent or guardian, in refusing to authorize a procedure, is thereby endangering the life or health of the minor, he or she should not feel bound by such a refusal. Rather, the doctor would be well advised to inform the local Children’s Aid Society (where the minor is younger than 16 years) of the situation. The Society or a public official responsible for the legal welfare of children may apply for a judicial determination of whether the child is to be given treatment according to the doctor’s recommendation. Best quality drugs approved by the FDA offered by a fully licensed pharmacy: you finally have a chance to buy macrobid online on very advantageous terms without having to worry about any of the aspects that usually prevent you from enjoying the treatment.